Dye v. Cowan’s Empirical Analysis
472 F.2d 1206 · 1972
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1998
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Tpo, Incorporated v. Hon. Thomas R. McMillen · Ingram v. Richardson · Anderson v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a judge may also designate a magistrate ... to submit to a judge of the court proposed findings and recommendations ... of applications for posttrial relief made by individuals convicted of criminal offenses....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Johnson“Judicial decision making, except in relation to minor offenses, ... is not within the prerogative of the United States magistrate nor can it be delegated to him by the United States District Judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Johnson“such additional duties as are not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.