Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 F.2d 1231 - United States v. Mills

United States v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

472 F.2d 1231 · 1972

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2013 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1973), 479 F. Supp. 486 - Tinetti v. Wittke (1979)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 11 states

23019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California · Turner v. United States · People v. Defore · Taglavore v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a person is charged with a collateral-type petty offense, under which he rightfully has the opportunity to post collateral and avoid further detention, and there is no probable cause to believe he committed a more serious crime, the police may not engage in an inventory search of the offender, or an equivalent direction that he empty his pockets, and seek to support it on the ground of holding him in further confinement, unless at a minimum he was timely notified of his opportunity to post collateral (and thus avoid further detention) and refused or was unable to do so. * * » 34”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.