Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 F.2d 459 - United States v. Culp

United States v. Culp’s Empirical Analysis

472 F.2d 459 · 1973

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
13
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably United States v. Dennis (1980), United States v. Faruolo (1974)

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 13 states

2401973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2115

Relies on Holland v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina · Lego v. Twomey · Cruz v. Hauck · Corallo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Many cases imply that where law enforcement officers indicate only that they will attempt to obtain or are getting a warrant that such a statement cannot serve to vitiate an otherwise consensual search. [omitted are numerous citations]."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We are in the process of getting one [a search warrant]; one of our men is getting one, and we'll search it [the premises] whether you like it or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the officers had made no improper or coercive promises or threats concerning leniency toward (his) wife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.