Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 F.2d 619 - Mock v. Rose

Mock v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

472 F.2d 619 · 1972

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably United States ex rel. Kirby v. Sturges (1975), Commonwealth v. Barnett (1976)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

23019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Bates v. United States · Russell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no prohibition against a viewing of a suspect alone in what is called a 'one-man showup' when this occurs near the time of the alleged criminal act; such a course does not tend to bring about misidentification but rather tends under some circumstances to insure accuracy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he [suspect] was not brought into view of [the victim] for a possible identification. The confrontation was accidental and unplanned and the identification ... was spontaneous. There was no suggestion of any kind, actual or implied, made by the police to [the victim] that the [suspect] was arrested [for the crime against her] ... We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances of this case there was no prejudice ... by the pre-trial identification____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.