Feeney v. AT & E, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
472 F.3d 560 · 2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Lowry v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. · Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co. · Cardiac Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, P.A. Profit Sharing Trust v. Bond · Stanford v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the danger of prejudice to the non-moving party; (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings; (3) whether the movant acted in good faith; and (4) the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether the movant had a good reason for delay is a key factor in the analysis ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The existence of a meritorious defense is also a relevant factor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.