Whitington v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis
472 F.3d 804 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2024
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Jernigan v. Stuchell · Penrod v. Zavaras · Ross v. County of Bernalillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A deprivation of hygiene items without any corresponding injury would not state an Eighth Amendment violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Requena v. Roberts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.