Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 F.3d 825 - United States v. Bennett

United States v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

472 F.3d 825 · 2006

Citation profile

179
cited by 179 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 179 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Gilbert v. United States (2011), United States v. Beckles (2009)

32 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1200200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · United States v. Rodriguez · United States v. Shelton · Lamarque v. Chavis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 179 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The defendant] failed to object to the facts of his prior convictions as contained in his PSI and addendum to the PSI despite several opportunities to do so; thus, he is deemed to have admitted to those facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “violent felony” under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). United States v. Bennett, 472 F.3d 825, 831 (11th Cir.2006). We review sentencing calculation issues raised for the first time on appeal for plain error. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) an error; (2) that is plain; (3) that affects substantial rights; and (4) that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.