Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 FSUPP2D 1055 - Yount v. Shashek

Yount v. Shashek’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
July 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1335 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Relies on Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Cockrell · 179 Ill. 2d 367 - Best v. Taylor MacHine Works · Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc. · Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad · 97 Ill. 2d 195 - Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the forum defendant rule applies only to defendants that have been properly joined and served at the time of removal within the meaning of Section 1441(b), the rule does not apply where a forum defendant has been fraudulently joined to defeat diversity jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.