472 F. Supp. 2d 1344 - Johnson v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · Estelle v. McGuire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a windfall opportunity to offer ... testimony that is damning to the defendant but that is not subject to a testimonial contest in the defense case unchallengeable testimony, the antithesis of a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Memoli“[e]vidence on a subject that is relevant and probative in the prosecution's case remains relevant and probative in the defense case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Memoli
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.