Kace v. Liang’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a judge has broad discretion to admit or exclude expert testimony when the proponent has not given proper notice of ... the subject matter of the expert's anticipated testimony, either in his answers to interrogatories or in his supplementary responses”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 94 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 - John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.

2. “The credibility of Johns Hopkins and Mayo Clinic as highly respected medical institutions or facilities is not enough to demonstrate the reliability of statements on individual pages of each institution's Web site.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. MOORE v. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. Et Al.

3. “subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 93 Mass. App. Ct. 661 - Larkin v. Dedham Medical Associates, Inc.