Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 N.E.2d 218 - Baker v. Wagers

Baker v. Wagers’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2007 · most notably Willis v. Westerfield (2006), Jones v. Marengo State Bank (1988)

29 state decisions

140198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palmer v. Hoffman · Patterson v. State · United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co. · Berry v. Louisiana · Coonan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'While the most commonly encountered witness today may be a person in authority of the record-keeping department of the business, he or she is not the only witness who can provide the necessary foundation for admission of a business record. This foundation can be established by anyone who possesses, with respect to the particular document in question the knowledge of the ... [required foundational elements]. This could be the entrant, the entrant's supervisor, co-workers, a records custodian or any other such person. What we demand is not a witness with a formalistic title but one with a functional understanding of the record-keeping process of the business with respect to the specific entry, transaction or declaration contained in the document.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a proper foundation for the specific test in question must still be established before those results are admissible into evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Trustworthiness and necessity were the parents”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.