State v. Nemeti’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2011
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Ross · United States v. Chadwick · State v. Zachodni
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the presence or absence of consent to search is a question of fact, the trial court’s resolution of that question will be upheld unless our examination of the evidence, construed in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings, convinces us that the finding was clearly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Krebs · State v. Almond“Voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from all the circumstances[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dreps“nature of a person's subjective understanding [of the right to refuse consent]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dreps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.