Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 472 So. 2d 1248 - Nessmith v. State

472 So. 2d 1248 - Nessmith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Use by Tr. Cts. of Stand. Jury Inst. · Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc. · Mancini v. State · 390 So. 2d 744 - Sanderson v. State · 374 So. 2d 1043 - Schramm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This construction of the statute [regarding official proceedings] is consistent with the realization that notaries public not only swear persons in connection with official proceedings but also notarize many sworn statements— affidavits, agreements, and the like — which are frequently not related to a pending legislative, judicial, administrative, or other government agency proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Official proceeding" means a proceeding heard, or which may be or is required to be heard, before any legislative, judicial, administrative, or other governmental agency or official authorized to take evidence under oath, including any referee, master in chancery, hearing examiner, commissioner, notary, or other person taking testimony or a deposition in connection with any such proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any person making a false oath before a notary public shall be guilty of perjury and be subject to the penalties, forfeitures, and disabilities that are prescribed by law in cases of perjury under chapter 837.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.