472 So. 2d 1325 - Vandergrift v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 239 So. 2d 17 - Coggan v. Coggan · 52 So. 2d 115 - Potter v. Garrett · Adkins v. Edwards · Chasteen v. Chasteen · 270 So. 2d 434 - Seesholts v. Beers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because there was no evidence here that the former wife claimed adversely to the former husband when she continued in possession of the former marital residence after she remarried or that she made it known to her former husband that she claimed exclusive right or title, there is no evidence of ouster.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrow v. Barrow“[t]here can be no holding adversely or ouster or its equivalent, by one cotenant unless such holding is manifested or communicated to the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrow v. Barrow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.