Lynch v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2003
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jett v. Commonwealth · Jones v. Rayborn · Balsley v. Commonwealth · Davis v. Harris · Thomas v. Schumaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““RCr 7.26 does mean what it says. It is our procedural counterpart of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 . If a Commonwealth witness has made a statement that has been reduced to writing, the de fendant is entitled to have it produced in the manner provided by the Rule.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.