Ex Parte Weiner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This Court has held that, in view of Art. 51.13, § 3, V.A.C.C.P. (1965), an individual may be extradited where he is charged with a felony by ‘an affidavit before a magistrate there, together with a copy of any warrant which issued thereon,’ e. g., Ex parte Posey, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 833 . . .; Ex parte Preston, Tex.Cr.App., 434 S.W.2d 136 . . In cases where a person is so extradited, the question of whether he is to be prosecuted upon an indictment or information is not a question for the courts of Texas to decide in extradition, but a question for the court of the dé-manding state. Ex parte Rhodes, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 425 . . .; Ex parte Posey, supra; Ex parte Clubb, Tex.Cr.App., 447 S.W.2d 185 , 187”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte Case

2. ““Whether the allegations are sufficient to support a prosecution in Missouri (if indeed the affidavit is intended to serve as the basis for a prosecution) is not a question to be determined by this Court in an extradition proceeding. Absent clear invalidity, the determination of validity of an affidavit or indictment upon which a demand for extradition is based and its sufficiency as a criminal pleading will be left to the courts of the demanding state. Ex parte Scott, [Tex.Cr.App.], 446 S.W.2d 307 . .. .; Ex parte Corley, [Tex.Cr.App.], 439 S.W.2d 668 . . .; Ex parte Powers, [Tex.Cr.App.], 391 S.W.2d 413 . . . .””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte Foss