Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 A2D 883 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. United States · Miranda v. United States · United States v. Shepherd · State v. Sargent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The object is to give each juror an opportunity, before the verdict is recorded, to declare in open court his assent to the verdict which the foreman has returned and thus to enable the court and the parties to ascertain with certainty that a unanimous verdict has in fact been reached and that no juror has been coerced or induced to agree to a verdict to which he has not fully assented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.