In re Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1035 · 10 U.S.C. § 1135 · 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Schwab v. Reilly · Carlucci & Legum v. Murray (In Re Murray) · Williams v. Metzler · In Re Colvin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Common iceboxes expressly designed and commercially known for home use; home-use kitchens; wash machines for home use whose cash price does not exceed two hundred (200) dollars; radio receiving sets whose cash price does not exceed one hundred (100) dollars; television sets for home use whose cash price does not exceed two hundred and fifty (250) dollars per unit, and electric irons for home use, are likewise exempted from attachment and execution. 32 L.P.R.A. § 1130(14).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Rivera
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.