Robert Boehm and Catherine Boehm v. Wayne F. Fox’s Empirical Analysis
473 F.2d 445 · 1973
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 1997 · most notably Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (1981), United States v. Radetsky (1976)
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bradley v. Milliken · Evangelist v. Bellern Research Corporation · Champion Home Builders and Roger L. Hickman v. Leona J. Shumate, Champion Home Builders and Roger L. Hickman v. Susan Gail Shumate, Etc., Champion Home Builders and Roger L. Hickman v. Michael G. Piper, Etc. · Topeka Mill & Elevator Co. v. Triplett · Jaeco Pump Co. v. Inject-O-Meter Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Wantonness is characterized by a realization of the imminence of damage to others and a restraint from doing what is necessary to prevent the damage because of indifference as to whether it occurs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Cudahy Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.