McDonald v. O'Meara’s Empirical Analysis
473 F.2d 799 · 1973
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2012
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Airlines, Inc. v. Stiles · Williams v. Marionneaux · Beaudine v. United States · California Company v. Price · Standard Oil Company of Texas and Pasotex Pipe Line Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He will be required to account to his employer for any gift, gratuity, or bene fit received by him in violation of his duty, or any interest acquired adverse to his principal without a full disclosure, though it does not appear that the principal has suffered any actual loss by fraud or otherwise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.