Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 F.3d 684 - Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Donelson

Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Donelson’s Empirical Analysis

473 F.3d 684 · 2007

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Wilko v. Swan · Negron v. United States · Tucker v. Wolter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[a]rbitrators are not required to explain their decisions. If they choose not to do so, it is all but impossible to determine whether they acted with manifest disregard for the law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.