Keith v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
473 F.3d 782 · 2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Liteky et al United States · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Withrow v. Larkin · United States v. Morgan · Offutt v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“decisionmaker 'displayed deep-seated and unequivocal antagonism that would render fair judgment impossible.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spicher v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.