Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

473 F. App'x 335

Baker v. Woolard

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-05-30

Decided 2012-05-30

PER CURIAM:

¶1Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/473/fappx/335 · .json · Public domain