473 F. Supp. 92 - Rone v. Fireman’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 706 · 29 U.S.C. § 721 · 29 U.S.C. § 722 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1397A (§ 2002 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Addington v. Texas · Shelton v. Tucker · O'Connor v. Donaldson · Jackson v. Indiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(A) ‘Eligibility for services’ means: (1) the presence of a physical or mental disability which for the person constitutes or results in a substantial handicap to employment; and (2) a reasonable expectation that VR services may benefit the person in terms of employability. Only an RSC counselor (or supervisor acting as counselor) may determine eligibility. “(1) ‘Disability’ means a physical or mental condition which materially limits, contributes to limiting, or if not corrected, will probably result in limiting an individual’s employment activities or vocational functioning. “(2) ‘Substantial handicap to employment’ means that a disability impedes a person’s occupational performance by preventing his or her obtaining, retaining, or preparing for employment consistent with capacities and abilities. “(3) ‘Employability’ means that VR services are likely to help a person enter or retain full-time or part-time employment consistent with his or her capacities and abilities * * 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.