Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 MASS 23 - Commonwealth v. Drayton

Commonwealth v. Drayton’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Crane v. Kentucky · Green v. Georgia · Montana v. Egelhoff · Giles v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by emphasizing the narrowness of the constitutional principle that governs this case and necessitates our remand.... In the vast majority of cases, the established hearsay exceptions will continue to govern the admissibility of hearsay evidence at most criminal trials, with this constitutional hearsay exception operating only in the rarest of cases, where otherwise inadmissible evidence is both truly critical to the defendant's case and bears persuasive guarantees of trustworthiness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'probably would have been a real factor in the jury's deliberations.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “plainly would have been critical to the defense”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.