Commonwealth v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Griffin v. Wisconsin · United States v. Knights · Oregon v. Hass · Samson v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contract[ing] around the reasonable suspicion requirement [and] making the issuance of a prisoner's parole subject to suspicionless searches and seizures of his home.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“inappropriately [would] allow the parole board to compel a parolee, keen to commute his or her sentence, to accept a condition that would unnecessarily and unreasonably limit his or her art. 14 privacy rights”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the Commonwealth's supervisory interests are more significant than a parolee's diminished expectation of privacy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.