473 So. 2d 1149 - Primm v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 534 So. 2d 329 - Hooks v. State (1987), 587 So. 2d 1072 - Parker v. State (1991)
2 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Irvin v. Dowd · California v. Beheler · Dobbert v. Florida · Mason v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`The admissibility of evidence, which has been challenged as irrelevant and remote, is within the sound discretion of the trial judge. A trial judge's decision to admit or exclude such evidence will not be overturned on the appeal absent an abuse of his discretion.' Primm v. State , 473 So.2d 1149 , 1157 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985)."”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“for purposes of receiving Miranda protection, the ultimate inquiry is simply whether there is a”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.