Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 So. 2d 1272 - State v. Inciarrano

473 So. 2d 1272 - State v. Inciarrano’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably 898 So. 2d 1 - Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-Florida (2004), State v. Smith (1994)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

9019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones · Chandler v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation and does not mean any public oral communication uttered at a public meeting or any electronic communication.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[it] protects only those `oral communications' uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation of privacy under circumstances reasonably justifying such an expectation. This expectation of privacy does not contemplate merely a subjective expectation on the part of the person making the uttered oral communication but rather contemplates a reasonable expectation of privacy. A reasonable expectation of privacy under a given set of circumstances depends upon one's actual subjective expectation of privacy as well as whether society is prepared to recognize this expectation as reasonable." [e.o.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““If criminal acts waive privacy rights, as the majority implies, police have the right and duty to intrude without a warrant into a bedroom where the owner/resident is smoking marijuana, reasoning that the Fourth Amendment protection has ‘gone up in smoke’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.