473 So. 2d 167 - Pace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2008
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. United States · 435 So. 2d 664 - Tokman v. State · 330 So. 2d 591 - Sharplin v. State · Green v. State · 290 So. 2d 625 - Shanklin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he jury is the trier of fact and if their verdict is supported by the evidence, we will not disturb it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We believe that the possibility of coercion, if any, lies in the trial judge's conduct and comments after he receives the division, that is, whether the judge merely affords the jury additional time to deliberate or whether he attempts to force a verdict by suggestive or coercive measures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the mere request and receipt of the jury's numerical division without reference to guilt or innocence does not coerce the jury and is not error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.