Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

473 So. 2d 203

473 So.2d 203

10 Fla.L.Weekly 243

Mccray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 25, 1985

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1985-04-25

Relies on 468 So. 2d 971 - Rotenberry v. State · Rotenberry v. State · McCray v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2013

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

EHRLICH, Justice.

¶1We accepted jurisdiction of this case because the district court certified the same question certified in Rotenberry v. State, 429 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), questioning the sufficiency of Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.04(c). Today, we find the instruction adequate in Roten-berry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 and accordingly approve the decision below. 433 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find no merit to the other issues raised by petitioner.

¶2It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.ADKINS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.
ADKINS, Justice,

¶3dissenting.

¶4I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Rotenberry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 (Fla.1985).

¶5SHAW, J., concurs.

/473/so2d/203 · .json · Public domain