Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

473 So. 2d 718

473 So.2d 718

10 Fla.L.Weekly 989

Cabbagestalk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-04-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1986

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Under the 1983 amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 487 So. 2d 1055 - State v. Cabbagestalk

Relies on 463 So. 2d 1236 - Tamer v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The order revoking appellant’s probation and ensuing sentence is reversed upon authority of Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 20, 1985), in which this court certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

UNDER THE 1983 AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 12 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, DOES THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE APPLY IN PROBATION REVOCATION HEARINGS?

¶2We again certify that question to the Supreme Court of Florida as a question of great public importance.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
/473/so2d/718 · .json · Public domain