Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 S.W.2d 523 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably Brasfield v. State (1980), Ward v. State (1992)

31 state decisions

1601971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Figueroa v. State · Hale v. State · 88 Tex. Crim. 46 - Luce v. State · Oakley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But we know of no case in this state that holds an indictment sufficient which does not in some way designate the number of things or animals alleged to have been stolen; and we hold that, if any case could be found, it would not be supported by authority.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rhodes v. State · Moore v. State
  2. “It is, of course, not sufficient to say that the accused knew with what offense he was charged, but the inquiry must be whether the charge in writing furnished that information in plain and intelligible language.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Zapata v. State · State v. Mendieta
  3. “... the rule is that an offense should be charged in plain and intelligible words with such certainty as to 1) enable the accused to know what he will be called upon to defend against and 2) to enable him to plead the judgment that may be given on it in bar of any further prosecution for the same offense. [numbering mine].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Garcia v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.