Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 SW2D 542 - McKellar v. Bracewell

McKellar v. Bracewell’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2010

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

8019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wagner v. Foster · Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrin · Womack v. Berry · Iley v. Hughes · Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears, however, that the rule of Iley v. Hughes has been applied primarily in personal injury tort actions. It is recognized that such cases have been accorded a special place in the jurisprudence of our State. By the express terms of Rule 174(b), supra, the trial court has wide discretion to order separate trials when judicial convenience is served and prejudice avoided. In the present case, the order granting separate trials served these salutary purposes.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The withdrawal of a partner from apartnership operates to dissolve the partnership as to the withdrawing partner.... The resignation of [partners] effect[s] a dissolution of the partnership as to their interests in it ... [It] did not effect a common law dissolution of the entire firm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.