Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 473 U.S. 716 - Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections

Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

888
cited by 888 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
38
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

151 federal appellate · 28 district · 562 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 888 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Alabama v. Michael Herman Bozeman (2001), Reed v. Farley (1994)

151 federal appellate · 28 district · 562 state decisions — followed in 38 states

319019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · United States v. Ewell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 888 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If trial is not had on any indictment, information, or complaint contemplated hereby prior to the prisoner's being returned to the original place of imprisonment pursuant to article V(e) hereof, such indictment, information, or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(a) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment, information or complaint on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he shall be brought to trial within 180 days after he shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer's jurisdiction written notice of the place of his imprisonment and his request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information, or complaint; provided, that for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance."”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A detainer is a request filed by a criminal justice agency with the institution in which a prisoner is incarcerated, asking the institution either to hold the prisoner for the agency or to notify the agency when release of the prisoner is imminent.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.