Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

474 F.2d 1008

Docket No. 72-1999.

Estate of Elliott v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-03-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1975

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Chandler · Estate of Elliott v. Commissioner · United States v. Mackenzie

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joseph H. Staley, Jr., Peter A. Franklin, III, Dallas, Tex., for petitioners-appellants.

Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Gilbert E. Andrews, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Acting Chief Counsel, William D. Brackett, Daniel B. Rosenbaum, Attys., I. R. S., Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Before WISDOM, BELL and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This is an appeal by the taxpayer from a decision of the Tax Court. Estate of Mae Elliott, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1971, 57 T.C. 152. Any doubt concerning the question presented was resolved adversely to appellants by the supervening Supreme Court decision in United States v. Chandler, 410 U.S. 257, 93 S.Ct. 880, 35 L.Ed.2d 247.

¶2

Affirmed.

/474/f2d/1008 · .json · Public domain