In re Dollinger’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.2d 1027 · 1973
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 132 · 35 U.S.C. § 134 · 35 U.S.C. § 141 · 35 U.S.C. § 7 (§ 8 of the Patent Act of 1952)
Relies on In re Hengehold · Archer v. Gordon · In re James · In re Sebek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Appeals may appeal to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Voss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.