In re de Seversky’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.2d 671 · 1973
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2015
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 120 · 35 U.S.C. § 145
Relies on Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board · In re Lund · DeSeversky v. Brenner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly identifying the subject matter which is incorporated and where it is to be found”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“To be sure, the statement that an application is a continuation-in-part, or a continuation, or a division, or in part a continuation of another application is in a broad sense a “reference” to the earlier application, but a mere reference to another application, or patent, or publication is not an incorporation of anything therein into the application" containing such reference for purpose of the disclosure required by 35 U.S.C. § 112 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.