Clinton Manges v. William B. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.2d 97 · 1973
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Ralpho v. Bell (1977), Ortego v. Weinberger (1975)
21 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 15 U.S.C. § 645
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 · Wolfe Londoner v. City and County of Denver · Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a very strong court created exception to withdrawal statutes. This exception comes into play when there has been a clear departure from statutory authority, and thereby exposes the offending agency to review of administrative action otherwise made unreviewable by statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 523 F. Supp. 568 - Mid America Bancorporation, Inc. v. Board of Governors · Groos National Bank and Clinton Manges v. Comptroller of the Currency, Groos National Bank of San Antonio, Texas, and Clinton Manges v. United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency““is the only section that could possibly subject a person to possible arbitrary and capricious judgment of one individual.” Id. at 100 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was not acting within [the] authority granted by Congress, then 12 U.S.C. Sec. 1818(i) could not withdraw jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.