Cagle v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.3d 1090 · 2007
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2022
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Engle v. Isaac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Without any new evidence of innocence, even the existence of a concededly meritorious constitutional violation is not in itself sufficient to establish a miscarriage of justice that would allow a habeas court to reach the merits of a barred claim.’ ” (quoting Schlup, 513 U.S. at 316 , 115 S.Ct. 851 )); Anderson v. Benik, 471 F.3d 811 , 815 (7th Cir.2006) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Knowles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.