Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 F.3d 324 - Abbott

Abbott’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Doe v. Jackson Local Schools School District (2011), 307 F. App'x 884 - Cadle Co. v. Reiner, Reiner & Bendett, P.C. (2009)

240200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Allen v. McCurry · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); Postma v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan of Sioux City, 74 F.3d 160 , 162 n.3 (8th Cir. 1996) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he doctrine of res judicata is employed to prevent multiple suits litigating the same cause of action. The doctrine bars a second, subsequent action when (1) the prior action was decided on the merits, (2) both actions involve the same parties or their privies, and (3) the matter in the second case was, or could have been, resolved in the first.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (6) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.