United States v. LeMoure’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.3d 37 · 2007
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2025
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · United States v. Dominguez Benitez · Henderson v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intended ... merely to include in section 1512 the same non-coercive influence that was (and is) found in section 1503. It would permit prosecution of such conduct in the Second Circuit, where it is not now permitted, and would allow such prosecutions in other circuits to be brought under section 1512 rather than under the catch-all provision of section 1503.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]ne could describe such choices as waivers of claims of error, [while] others might say - 47 - that there is no error at all when counsel is content and foregoes an optional objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“think[ing] that 'objectionable' testimony from an adverse witness helps more than it hurts or that a cautionary instruction will underscore testimony best ignored.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.