Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 F.3d 609 - Henrichs v. Valley View Development

Henrichs v. Valley View Development’s Empirical Analysis

474 F.3d 609 · 2007

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Reusser v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (2008), Bell v. City of Boise (2013)

9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

530200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 18 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Johnson v. De Grandy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Rooker - Feldman doctrine provides that federal district courts lack jurisdiction to exercise appellate review over final state court judgments." Henrichs v. Valley View Dev. , 474 F.3d 609 , 613 (9th Cir. 2007) (some citations omitted) (citing Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 , 415-16, 44 S. Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923) ) ; District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 , 482-86, 103 S. Ct. 1303 , 75 L. [Ed. 2d 206 (1983) ]. "Essentially, the doctrine bars 'state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced' from asking district courts to review and reject those judgments." Id. (quoting Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp. , 544 U.S. 280 , 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517 , 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005) ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Rooker - Feldman doctrine provides that federal district courts lack jurisdiction to exercise appellate review over final state court judgments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.