Raygoza v. Hulick’s Empirical Analysis
474 F.3d 958 · 2007
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Harris v. Thompson (2012), Smith v. McKee (2010)
19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Rompilla v. Beard · Hall v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[G]eneralities fall away when we are dealing with an 'n' of one: it is the facts of the particular case, and the particular alibi defense, that matter.”); Canaan v. McBride, 395 F.3d 376 , 385 (7th Cir. 2005) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.