In Re Sinaltrainal Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Foman v. Davis · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Bell v. Hood · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a searching review, particularly with regard to allegations concerning conspiracy or joint action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]leadings must be something more than an ingenious academic exercise in the conceivable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the more flexible 'arising under' formula.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.