Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 MASS 301 - Commonwealth v. Valentin

Commonwealth v. Valentin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alleyne v. United States · Liotta v. National Forge Co. · Commonwealth v. Kozec · Commonwealth v. Cundriff · Commonwealth v. Acevedo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The critical questions are whether the * weapons-related evidence is relevant and, if so, whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where a weapon definitively could not have been used in the commission of the crime, we have generally cautioned against admission of evidence related to it”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.