¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for immediate consideration and peremptory reversal are DENIED.
474 Mich. 1024
708 N.W.2d 401
Docket Docket Nos. 129123 & (49)(50), COA No. 257626.
Bank One v. Condit
BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, and Craig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.
Decided January 30, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-01-30
Decided 2006-01-30