¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
474 Mich. 1024
710 N.W.2d 260
Docket Docket No. 129317. COA No. 260219.
Nathan v. Crenshaw
David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Decided January 30, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-01-30
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2018
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-01-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →