¶1On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of August 30, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
474 Mich. 1064
711 N.W.2d 17
Docket Docket No. 127064 (21), COA No. 254936.
KOSMAL v. Ameritech
Kathleen KOSMAL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERITECH, Defendant-Appellant, and Second Injury Fund (Vocationally Handicapped Provisions), Defendant-Appellee.
Decided February 27, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-02-27
Decided 2006-02-27