¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
474 Mich. 1095
711 N.W.2d 372
Docket Docket No. 130102, COA No. 253718.
Baker v. Baker
Ronald Carl BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Suzanne Mary BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.
Decided March 27, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-03-27
Decided 2006-03-27