¶1On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
474 Mich. 1109
782 N.W.2d 475
Docket Docket No. 130784. COA No. 269198.
People v. ACEVAL
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander ACEVAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided April 7, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-04-07
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2019
2 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-04-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →